Skip to content

Pursuing Happiness (by Gemma Burke)

March 6, 2008

Happiness, defined in the dictionary as a state of well being is one of psychology’s greatest mysteries.  Positive psychology is a popular new psychology that has set out to uncover fascinating evidence based answers to questions surrounding happiness. For much of its history psychology has seemed some-what obsessed with human feelings and pathology. (The scientific study of the nature of disease and its causes, processes, development, and consequences, also called pathobiology.) Positive psychology is a recent addition to the world of psychology that studies the strengths and virtues that allow communities and individuals to thrive.

In fact the very idea of psychotherapy, which was first formalised by Freud, rests on a view of human beings as troubled creatures in need of repair. Freud with his pessimistic outlook on human nature, which he believed to be governed by deep dark drives that could only tenuously be controlled, shared parallel views with those of a German philosopher Arthur Schropenhauer. Schropenhauer also an extreme pessimist believed that happiness was an illusion. Through his opinions that happiness is the absence of pain, frustration and dissatisfaction, Schropenhauers extreme hedonism installed in himself that the answer was not to seek happiness but to get through life with the minimum amount of suffering. In short the key to making life bearable for the German philosopher was simply to have extremely low expectations.

It has also been shown that there is a strong correlation between happiness and success, generally people with a good income and a high status in a community tend to be, more often than not, happiest. But which comes first happiness or success? The two are without doubt inter-related but in complicated ways, and to only talk about how success leads to happiness is ignoring half of the story, as Sonja Lyumbomirsky and colleagues have uncovered that there is potential evidence that points to happiness leading to success. These studies have produced a raft of fascinating findings that demonstrate that people in  a positive mood are more likely to talk to others, to be interested in leisure activities, enjoy social interactions, resolve conflicts easily, help others, feel healthier, perform tasks better and more often attribute success to their own skills.  This then links to materialism, which in psychology is deemed to be a dirty word. Studies consistently show that people who agree with statements like “You will buy things just because you want them” tend to be: less satisfied with life, less happy, more likely to be depressed, more paranoid and more narcissistic. Unfortunately for us 50% of our happiness is predisposed in us through our genetic make-up. The other 50% can be made up by our overall circumstances like our demographics, money education etc. Sheldon & Lyumbomirsky (2007) estimate circumstantial factors at only 10%, which is dwarfed in comparison to our genetic contribution. In other words, your happiness consists of how happy you naturally are, plus whatever is going on in your life to affect your happiness.

In the end philosophy and science converge on the fact that thinking about your own happiness doesn’t make it any easier to be happy. In fact many say we are at our happiest when we are absorbed in what we are doing and the trouble is that asking yourself about your frame of mind is a sure way to lose your flow. So in few words if you want to be happy, don’t constantly ask yourself if you are.

10 Comments leave one →
  1. DOUGAN permalink
    March 11, 2008 12:13 pm

    Pursuing Happiness

    This is an interesting article about happiness. It never occurred to me that 50% of my happiness was down to my genetic make-up. Does it mean if my ancestors were happy I would be too? This is a fact I would be keen on knowing more about. Anyways, right now I think my happiness is down to me, my family and the society I am living in. Don’t you think? I don’t believe we are asking ourselves too much if we are happy (I don’t remember asking myself that question!!), but rather we are asked if we are happy. Does this count too because if it does I am not answering anymore of these questions.

    Anna Marie Dougan

  2. ABBERTON permalink
    March 23, 2008 11:24 am

    A 50% rating is considerably high for happiness attributed to genetic factors. I would have thought that a higher percentage would be down to the fact that you make your own happiness in life. Yes, it is clear that a person with high status is generally happy, however wealth cant be the main factor. No matter who you are, it is the small things that count.

  3. ROWNTREE permalink
    March 25, 2008 8:32 am

    I think the fact our happiness is largely determined by our genetic make-up makes sense, because it has also been shown that some people have a biological predisposition for developing depression. That is, some people are more likely to develop depression than others because of their genetic make-up. Perhaps the reason circumstantial factors have so little effect on our happiness is because some people are just better equipped to cope with poor circumstances, like low income, little education etc. Your happiness depends on how you deal with the things life throws at you.

  4. FLANNERY permalink
    March 28, 2008 8:40 am

    I disagree with Schropenhauer and Freud in this area as i am generally an
    optimistic person. I feel that happiness is a state of it’s own as opposed to
    being an absence of something. I do however think that reducing feelings
    of frustration,pain and dissatisfaction contributes to happiness.But there
    are also postive contributers which must be added to the situation to achieve the goal of happiness.Success, love and health are some of these. Although when it comes to deciding where happiness comes from, it depends on the individual and their outlook on life, either positive or negative, where they themselves find happiness.Whether it may be an absence of a negitive aspect of their lives or the gaining of a positive aspect.

    Ceola Flannery

  5. CALLANAN permalink
    April 8, 2008 11:50 am

    50% of your happiness is genetic but does that not in turn contribute to the other 50%. You could be successful in life wealthy, big house, nice family and still suffer from depression. Happiness is no illusion like Schropenhauer says, happiness, even tough its hard to beleive, is what makes the world turn. If everybody on earth just wanted to get through life with as little suffering if would be pointless!

    Darragh Callanan

  6. ODONOHUE permalink
    April 8, 2008 3:07 pm

    Interesting post. It seems as though Freud and his friends weren’t too happy! I always thought that happiness was a state of mind and that one made the choice to be either happy or not, however, from the above post it seems that its somewhere near half and half in terms of genetics and circumstantial factors. I think whatever the porportions, statistics, philosophies and research, one should(in the words of famous poet Max Ehrmann) ‘strive to be happy’.

  7. KEEGAN permalink
    April 10, 2008 7:21 am

    I found this article very interesting. I was shocked that 50% of happiness is inherited from our ancestors, however when I think about it, it makes sense. After all depression, a persons ‘hot-headedness’ and other moods and characteristics could all be said to be inherited from a person’s family. Usually, I have found, people with happy families are happier in nature themselves. However I don’t think success is a huge factor in a persons happiness. Sometimes the poorest man (or women) will be a lot happier than wealthier and successful than them. So this leads me to think that’s it’s the people in our life that take most of the credit for our happiness , whether its through the 50% generic contribution or remaining 50%.

  8. FRIPP permalink
    April 11, 2008 10:45 am

    Like most of the other replies, I am surprised at the 50% genetic happiness stat. It’s not that I disagree with it, but I would like to find out how they come up with that statistic, is there some sort of happy-o-meter that I am unaware of? No doubt whatever psychological experiment they used to determine this stat had some flaws, the unpredictability of humans? The uniqueness of an individual? The fact that humans put in certain enviroments tend to lie subconsciously? I’m not a pessimist, I just find it hard to believe this statistic applies to everyone.

    Daniel Fripp

  9. NICGIOLLACHOMHAILL permalink
    April 11, 2008 1:24 pm

    50%, that’s madness! the idea of inheriting happiness from our ancestors is such a strange concept to me, but like KEEGAN has said we inherit a lot of our characteristics from our ancestors, why not happiness! I don’t think that a richer person would necessarily be happier than someone of less money. I’ve never really thought about happiness, so in saying that i think that when you are happy you may not realise it but its when you look back at the good time then you feel happiness because of the memories!

    Oscar Levant – “Happiness isn’t something you experience; it’s something you remember.”

  10. April 22, 2008 9:05 am

    I like the idea of a happy-o-meter! Happiness is an issue that has received much study and attention – not least because people strive for it to such a great degree and the flip side of it, despair and depression, is so dangerous and potentially life threatening. I think many Philosophers offer great advice on life and happiness.

    “Thou must be like a promontory of the sea, against which, though the waves beat continually, yet it both itself stands, and about it are those swelling waves stilled and quieted.” Marcus Aurelius

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.